Pet peeves, Volume I

I don't generally write about bodily functions, but I can't discuss my most recent pet peeve without alluding to some of them. Let the squeamish be warned.

Some wrong-headed environmentalist*- probably from California, which is where most wrong-headedness seems to come from- thought it would be smart to invent- and then foist on the American public- the low volume toilet. The reasoning behind this abomination is that using less water per flush will conserve water and help to ensure a cleaner, less processed water supply.

This reasoning might hold water if all people even did was pee, but as we all know, people produce other denser products that need to be flushed. Low volume toilets are not up to the task. SOOO... for every normal flushing of the large intestines, there follows a minimum of three toilet flushings to move the detritus out of the commode. Three, times the number of people in the household, times the number of evacuations per day. Low volume toilets. What a savings.

And, of course, low volume toilets don't have a large volume of water to produce the good hefty pressure needed to move solids so at least a couple of times a week, it's PLUNGER TIME!! Is there any task- other than changing dirty diapers- more hateful than plunging a backed-up toilet? I don't even like the fact that I produce fecal matter, so you can imagine my joy in having to deal with it. I want one big flush and everything gone at once! I hope you're with me on this.

* There are right-headed environmentalists, by the way. They aren't in the toilet business.