Friday, July 22, 2005

It's official... I am my mother... and other horrors

Last May, I went on a shopping binge for Dave's mom, who was celebrating the big 77. Among the things I got for her were two floral house coats. I remember her AND my mom practically living in house coats during my childhood. Of course, they were never worn out of the house- they were HOUSE coats. Actually they were/are short sleeved, cotton, calf-length, button-front or snap-front robes. Women of my grandmothers' generation put them on over their day clothes while they did housework and cooked. The house coat protected their clothing like an all encompassing apron. If some one came to the door, the house coat was slipped off and the lady of the house looked presentable for her company.

The next generation- our mothers' generation- didn't bother to put on day clothes most of the time. Off came the night clothes, on went the house coat and that was dressed for the day- unless she had to go out. And by that I mean REALLY out. She might wear her house coat to pick up the kids at school as long as she didn't have to get out of the car, but she would never wear it to the grocery store or post office. She didn't bother to change out of her house coat if she had company, either, since her company was usually family, neighbors and kids. If a salesman or stranger came to the door, she would dash to get dressed, but those exciting events were few and far between. She had coffee with the milkman and the next door neighbor three times a week- in her house coat.

I remember thinking that I would NEVER be so slothful as to spend a whole day in a house coat. It was analogous to spending the whole day in your pajamas, in my opinion, and what was with all the florals and lace, anyway? Hideous. However, whenever I remember my Mom, I remember her in her house coats. She had tons of them.

SO, based on history, I naturally thought Dave's mom would be delighted with the ones I bought her for her birthday. I was wrong. She tottered into my bedroom with them one afternoon and gave them to me. "They're too big", she said. "I want you to have them." I had already washed them, so there was no returning them, and I accepted them gracefully. "I'll go get you some in a smaller size," I said, to which she hurriedly replied, "No, no, thank you, no." Guess she really loved them :)

And, of course, you know what happened. One day late in the week when I was WAAAY behind in the laundry, and feeling fat and dreading any article of clothing with a waistband, I slipped on one of the house coats. Damn, it was comfy. Damn, it IS comfy. So comfy I carried one with me to San Diego. Its' the perfect article of clothing. Too bad it looks like bed clothes, lacks style, and only comes in assorted florals.

So... gray hair... allergies... asthma...dry skin... crooked mouth...and now, house coats. I am my mother. When we meet again, she is SOOO going to laugh at me.

Monday, July 18, 2005

Bill Murray and Harry Potter

I have found myself sobbing over the deaths of people who have never existed twice this week. Admitting I am emotionally vulnerable since the recent death of my baby brother, I found the experiences cathartic.

The first heart-wringer this week was the quirky film "The Life Aqautic with Steve Zissou" starring Bill Murray, an actor whose characters aren't usually noted for their emotional depth. Something has happened to Bill Murray in the past couple of years. He seems to have found his own heart.
Evidence 1: He was speaking of his life and his six sons with Jay Leno and in the midst of describing how deeply he loved them, he wept. It was touching beyond words.
Evidence 2: "Lost in Translation" was the first cinematic hint that Murray had finally learned how to convey feeling in a way that suited both his personality and his persona. He made scenes believably moving without being maudlin.
Evidence 3: "The Life Aquatic". Perhaps it is entering middle age that has allowed Murray to plum the depths of the heart while maintaining his superficial cool. It is a tough time of life, when a person is neither young or old, but can see too clearly the end of days on the horizon and cannot help but wonder if anything really made a difference. "The Life Aquatic" is classified as a comedy, and it is droll and funny and subversive, like Murray himself; it is also a very moving treatise on loss. All the relationships in this movie are bizarrely complex in deeply human ways, and Murray threads his way through them with a dignity and grace that is fragile, redeeming, and beautiful.

"The Life Aquatic", with all its droll poignancy, triggered the first of my cathartic weeps. I have always, and will always, cry at movies. I am an embarrassment to anyone who goes into a theater with me. But I was at home in my own apartment watching this movie, and so felt free to weep freely. As I wept, I realized that, in this case, at least, the word "movie" really fits.

The second cathartic weep came upon reading the latest installment of the Harry Potter saga. I will not give away any of the plot, but as I read the last few chapters, I was sobbing unabashedly. Books can make me cry almost as easily as movies do, and the Potter books are, in their own way, treatises on loss as well. Think of the poor child Harry. He witnesses the murder of his parents at the age of one. He is sent to live with an aunt and uncle who, for ten years, mistreat and neglect him. He is so starved for connection that, when he goes off to school, it becomes the home he has never had even though every time he goes there, something tries to kill him, he ends up in the hospital, and he suffers trauma, fear, injury, and- in the later books- the deaths of friends. Harry has a loving heart. Where did that come from? He is not needy, he is not manipulative, despite all the years of emotional barrenness he endured. He makes real, committed connections with other people and cares for them deeply. Dumbledore comments on Harry's remarkable ability to love several times; because love is the one thing Voldemort cannot understand, it is one of Harry's most powerful weapons. But how do the unloved learn to love? How does Harry manage to go on, book after book, fearing the loss or losing someone he loves?

And why do I care? Harry Potter does not exist. Neither do Ron, Hermione, Neville, Ginny, the Weasleys... But I do. I feel his losses as I read, and weep for those who have never existed as emblems of those who have. Life IS about loss. When you reach middle-age as I have, you begin to see that. But it is also about love. And both can make you cry.

Thursday, July 14, 2005

Sears-Mart... Who needs it?

I don't know what is happening to our K-Mart back in Tullahoma now that K-Mart and Sears are merging, but I DO know what is happening to the K-Marts here in the San Diego, and it sucks.

Let's start with the new name. I thought it would be a marketing coup to rename the conjoined stores S-Mart; S for Sears, Mart for K-Mart... S-Mart for s-mart shoppers. Dave was pretty sure Sears wasn't going to give up its name and I am glad I didn't bet with him. The new stores here are called "Sears Essentials". Yuck.

I don't see how that is going to help them, keeping the Sears name. It's not like the store has been doing banner business in the past few years- ESPECIALLY since they got rid of the world renowned Sears Catalog. How stupid was that- getting OUT of the catalog business just as it, and on-line sales- were starting to boom?! IDIOTS!

I personally have always hated Sears, and it's been literally years since I have shopped at a Sears store. The only things that store was good for, in my opinion, were Craftsman tools and Kenmore appliances- which are really Maytags and Whirlpools, anyway. When, after being a Sears card holder for over 20 years, Sears refused to deliver or install a very expensive refrigerator we were going to buy with cash to little out-of-the-way Tullahoma, I was done with that store. We got our refrigerator- for less- from Lowe's in little out-of-the-way T-Town.

I've never cared for K-Mart, either. It is a really hateful place to shop. There is no climate control, and that is a nationwide phenomenom. The stores are hot in the summer and cold in the winter, poorly staffed, poorly stocked, and often dirty. There is one and only one reason to go to K-Mart and her name is Martha Stewart.

I heard from one of the employees at the K-Mart here that, short of a miracle of negotiation, Sears Essentials will NOT be carrying the Martha Stewart lines. PUH-LEEZE! What else did K-Mart bring to the table? As much as I hate K-Mart, I was in there all the time because I love Martha Stewart. Her products are well-thought out, well- executed, fashionable, functional, and damn good values. Without Martha Stewart, I will have absolutely no reason to step into another K-Mart, regardless of what they choose to call it.

I am a world class shopper. I like to shop. I like to spend. God has blessed my hubby and I at the end of our working careers with a pretty hefty disposable income, and I dispose of it. K-Mart used to get a big chunk of it. Sears didn't get a dime. Sears Essentials will not be getting a dime of it either. I will go where the Martha Stewart line goes for my housewares, linens, towels, and accessories. I like her stuff. I have no use for Sears or K-Mart without it.

Wonder how long Sears Essentials will last without it? Maybe she'll go to Target. Think we'll ever get a Target in Tullahoma? Gee, I wish I had Martha's number...

Tuesday, July 12, 2005

No vampires??

I have had a weird sort of disappointing relief upon returning to San Diego. You may recall that I was suspicious that my new neighbors are vampires. I have seen them only once, and they were beautiful in a scary, anorexic, cowboy Goth sort of way. They never come out during the day. Or night, for that matter. As I said, since they moved in, I have only seen them once, that first night as they glided up the walkway in the moonlight and disappeared into their apartment. No sound, no smells of cooking, no music or sound of running water have come from that apartment since. An eery silence descended that has been disturbing yet thrilling.

On my return, however, it appears the "romance" is over. First of all, Kelly has, in fact, seen the neighbors and in the daytime, too. I have grilled her about the people she saw- did she actually see them come out of or go into THAT apartment? What did they look like? Was it really day- was the sun out? She seems pretty confident that she has seen the new neighbors. And in the daytime.

And as if that wasn't bad enough... I could discount her reports but I cannot dispute the evidence of my own eyes. No, no, I have not seen the new neighbors. I have seen their door mat.

It has lady bugs on it. Lady bugs. What self respecting vampire would put out a door mat with roly poly beetles on it? It is depressingly cheery. One part of me wants to believe that it is just a lure- sure, come on in, it's safe in here, heh, heh, heh- but no. No. You'd have to see this door mat to understand my disappointment. It's cute.

Well, there goes the last vestige of adventure and intrigue in my life. If you can't count on your neighbors to be vampires, what's left?

Sigh.

Thursday, July 07, 2005

Pet peeves, Volume I

I don't generally write about bodily functions, but I can't discuss my most recent pet peeve without alluding to some of them. Let the squeamish be warned.

Some wrong-headed environmentalist*- probably from California, which is where most wrong-headedness seems to come from- thought it would be smart to invent- and then foist on the American public- the low volume toilet. The reasoning behind this abomination is that using less water per flush will conserve water and help to ensure a cleaner, less processed water supply.

This reasoning might hold water if all people even did was pee, but as we all know, people produce other denser products that need to be flushed. Low volume toilets are not up to the task. SOOO... for every normal flushing of the large intestines, there follows a minimum of three toilet flushings to move the detritus out of the commode. Three, times the number of people in the household, times the number of evacuations per day. Low volume toilets. What a savings.

And, of course, low volume toilets don't have a large volume of water to produce the good hefty pressure needed to move solids so at least a couple of times a week, it's PLUNGER TIME!! Is there any task- other than changing dirty diapers- more hateful than plunging a backed-up toilet? I don't even like the fact that I produce fecal matter, so you can imagine my joy in having to deal with it. I want one big flush and everything gone at once! I hope you're with me on this.

* There are right-headed environmentalists, by the way. They aren't in the toilet business.

Friday, July 01, 2005

Nature and nurture

My son is a very remarkable and interesting person, and has been since the moment he graced the planet and my life with his presence. Note I did not say "easy" or "sweet", though he can be sweet when he makes an effort. He has never been easy. He is too smart, too talented, too eclectic, and too damn stubborn to ever be easy, and he was born in a hurry. Patience is not his strong suit.

My son is a big, handsome charmer with a smile that knocks you off your feet, and dimples the size of New Jersy. Though he is truly is own man, he is also his father's son; intelligent, intellectually curious, physically skilled, a problem solver. More than anyone else, however, he reminds me of his two grandfathers. In any argument over which has the greater influence in the development in a personality, nature or nurture, the answer is almost always "both". My son proves the rule. He has known my father all his life. He never knew Dave's father. Yet both men live on in him, and I see little evidences of them in his complex personality every day.

My dad, who calls himself "Lovable Bill" is mercurial, charming and a natural salesman. He is not an easy person either, (though for different reasons). At 80, he is still a handsome man and he knows it. He thinks very well of himself. Bill is alternately completely selfish and completely generous. He has an incredible green thumb and used to have some of the most beautiful lawns and gardens in town, back in the day when he owned his own home. He has always been a bit of a male chauvinist, loving women without really thinking they were worth much, though he thought my mother, at least, was a "lady". I see some of these attributes in varying degrees in my son, especially the charm.

Dave's dad never got to meet my son. Dominic died two years before he was born, which was a terrible shame, because they would have really loved one another. Dominic could be stubborn and/or unreasonable, but most of my memories of him are filled with love. Dominic was blessed with so many gifts- everything but an education, the lack of which negatively affected his self-esteem. He was a master mechanic and could make or fix anything. He created a pen with a radio in it years before they become available on the market. He was a brilliant craftsman. He crafted his own violin and taught himself to play it. He taught himself to play the accordion, though he played it upside down because he was left-handed. He was a master builder, building or remodeling every house he ever owned. He was a master gardener. I remember helping him in his huge garden many years early in my marriage, and getting the benefit of the bounty that came from it. The first year of my marriage, Dave and I were helping rake leaves and Dave's wedding band slipped off his finger. We looked and looked and could not find it. As it started to get dark, we gave up and went home. The next day, Dominic called to say he'd found it. He'd gone out with a flash light to look for it and hadn't stopped looking until he found it. Such a romantic. He was a beautiful man, both physically and in his soul. My son even walks like him, an almost tiptoeing, rolling kind of a walk.

Like his grandfathers, my son is a beautiful man. He has many talents, skills and gifts and many of the personality traits of both my dad and Dave's. He is more than the sum of his parts, as are we all, but in my son, the influences that helped shape him are easy to see. It's not that I don't see traces of myself, or Dave, and any number of other people in my children. My daughter, for example, reminds me very much of her Aunt Rita. It's just that, with my son, there are times when it's almost like stepping back in time and seeing my dad as a young man, or Dave's dad as a young man. He's a better man than both of them, but they are there in him.